Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 29: Line 29:  
* '''Removing content from article pages without discussion'''.  We take a dim view of the plain removal of information; it smacks of censorship. Try to find a way of incorporating the other person's viewpoint into the article.  When necessary, discuss on the talk page.
 
* '''Removing content from article pages without discussion'''.  We take a dim view of the plain removal of information; it smacks of censorship. Try to find a way of incorporating the other person's viewpoint into the article.  When necessary, discuss on the talk page.
 
* '''Inserting false information'''.   
 
* '''Inserting false information'''.   
−
* '''Inserting nonsense/gibberish into pages'''.  'Nuff said.
+
* '''Inserting nonsense/gibberish into pages'''.   
 
* '''Spam'''.  Spamming links to external sites is a problem on many wikis.  Some people view a wiki as just a vehicle for self promotion and increasing the visibility of their own external web site, whether it be hawking crackpot scientific theories, herbal supplements, or whatever.  It is strictly forbidden.  Wholesale cutting and pasting mainspace and talk pages within Conservapedia that include category links and other users' electronic signatures can also be considered spamming.  Reposting another user's electronic signature is a blockable offense.
 
* '''Spam'''.  Spamming links to external sites is a problem on many wikis.  Some people view a wiki as just a vehicle for self promotion and increasing the visibility of their own external web site, whether it be hawking crackpot scientific theories, herbal supplements, or whatever.  It is strictly forbidden.  Wholesale cutting and pasting mainspace and talk pages within Conservapedia that include category links and other users' electronic signatures can also be considered spamming.  Reposting another user's electronic signature is a blockable offense.
 
* '''[[Conservapedia:Sockpuppet|Sockpuppetry]]'''.  We do not allow use of multiple accounts for the purpose of evading blocks or making one's point of view appear to be more widely held than it is.  There are mechanisms for appealing blocks, involving email or requests on the blocking sysop's talk page.
 
* '''[[Conservapedia:Sockpuppet|Sockpuppetry]]'''.  We do not allow use of multiple accounts for the purpose of evading blocks or making one's point of view appear to be more widely held than it is.  There are mechanisms for appealing blocks, involving email or requests on the blocking sysop's talk page.
Irenaeus, Siteadmin, Check users, oversight, Administrators
351,679

edits

Navigation menu