| Line 68: |
Line 68: |
| | [[File:Antifa killer.jpeg|right|350px|thumb|Biden terrorist Michael Reinoehl (''right, white shirt, black hat'') lies in wait drawing his pistol for Patriot Prayer warrior [[Aaron Danielson]] (''left, tan shorts, black shirt and hat'').]] | | [[File:Antifa killer.jpeg|right|350px|thumb|Biden terrorist Michael Reinoehl (''right, white shirt, black hat'') lies in wait drawing his pistol for Patriot Prayer warrior [[Aaron Danielson]] (''left, tan shorts, black shirt and hat'').]] |
| | [[Gateway Pundit]] reporter Cassandra Fairbanks’ Twitter account was suspended for tweeting “Kyle Rittenhouse did nothing wrong.” Twitter claims that this statement is “glorifying violence.” Fairbanks told ''[[Breitbart News]]:'' | | [[Gateway Pundit]] reporter Cassandra Fairbanks’ Twitter account was suspended for tweeting “Kyle Rittenhouse did nothing wrong.” Twitter claims that this statement is “glorifying violence.” Fairbanks told ''[[Breitbart News]]:'' |
| − | {{Quotebox|“The fact that you can no longer defend someone on social media who has not been convicted of any crime should shock and terrify everyone. They want to control all narratives… and we are letting them get away with it. KYLE RITTENHOUSE DID NOTHING WRONG.”}} | + | {{Quotebox-float|“The fact that you can no longer defend someone on social media who has not been convicted of any crime should shock and terrify everyone. They want to control all narratives… and we are letting them get away with it. KYLE RITTENHOUSE DID NOTHING WRONG.”}} |
| | John Pierce, attorney for Rittenhouse, condemned [[Twitter]]: | | John Pierce, attorney for Rittenhouse, condemned [[Twitter]]: |
| − | {{quotebox|“A journalist just got banned from Twitter for simply posting ‘Kyle Rittenhouse did nothing wrong. Twitter and other [[Big Tech]] companies are now engaged in brazen and outright [[censorship]] of political speech. | + | {{quotebox-float|“A journalist just got banned from Twitter for simply posting ‘Kyle Rittenhouse did nothing wrong. Twitter and other [[Big Tech]] companies are now engaged in brazen and outright [[censorship]] of political speech. |
| | | | |
| | “They can no longer pretend to be neutral ‘internet computer service’ providers protected from [[defamation]] claims by [[Section 230]] of the Communications Decency Act. They have now stepped in the arena and are publishers. Myself and Lin Wood intend to hold Twitter fully liable to Nicholas Sandmann, Kyle Rittenhouse, and every other person whose life it has tried to destroy simply because it disagrees with their political viewpoints.”<ref>https://www.breitbart.com/tech/2020/08/30/journalist-cassandra-fairbanks-suspended-from-twitter-over-kyle-rittenhouse-support/</ref>}} | | “They can no longer pretend to be neutral ‘internet computer service’ providers protected from [[defamation]] claims by [[Section 230]] of the Communications Decency Act. They have now stepped in the arena and are publishers. Myself and Lin Wood intend to hold Twitter fully liable to Nicholas Sandmann, Kyle Rittenhouse, and every other person whose life it has tried to destroy simply because it disagrees with their political viewpoints.”<ref>https://www.breitbart.com/tech/2020/08/30/journalist-cassandra-fairbanks-suspended-from-twitter-over-kyle-rittenhouse-support/</ref>}} |