''[[The New York Times]]'' reported in September 2021 on the complicity of the 2016 Clinton Campaign:
''[[The New York Times]]'' reported in September 2021 on the complicity of the 2016 Clinton Campaign:
{{quotebox-float|"Some of the questions that Mr. Durham’s team has been asking in recent months — including of witnesses it subpoenaed before a [[grand jury]], according to people familiar with some of the sessions — suggest he has been pursuing a theory that the Clinton campaign used Perkins Coie to submit dubious information to the F.B.I. about Russia and [[Donald Trump|Mr. Trump]] in an effort to gin up investigative activity to hurt his 2016 campaign."<ref>https://www.nytimes.com/2021/09/15/us/politics/durham-michael-sussmann-trump-russia.html</ref>}}
{{quotebox-float|"Some of the questions that Mr. Durham’s team has been asking in recent months — including of witnesses it subpoenaed before a [[grand jury]], according to people familiar with some of the sessions — suggest he has been pursuing a theory that the Clinton campaign used Perkins Coie to submit dubious information to the F.B.I. about Russia and [[Donald Trump|Mr. Trump]] in an effort to gin up investigative activity to hurt his 2016 campaign."<ref>https://www.nytimes.com/2021/09/15/us/politics/durham-michael-sussmann-trump-russia.html</ref>}}
+
According to Durham’s complaint, Danchenko's attorney is a partner at the firm that is "currently representing the 2016 “Hillary for America” presidential campaign (the “Clinton Campaign”), as well as multiple former employees of that campaign, in matters before the Special Counsel.”<ref>https://www.scribd.com/document/548384111/Danchenko-ECF-35-US-Motion-to-Inquire-Into-Potential-Conflicts-of-Interest</ref>