Irenaeus, Siteadmin, Check users, oversight, Administrators
351,922
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 30:
Line 30: − + − + + +
Essay: The Conservapedia atheism article is currently receiving about 11,110 page views a month. And it is merely one of the 1,900+ atheism related articles at Conservapedia. (view source)
Revision as of 01:44, December 21, 2021
, 01:44, December 21, 2021→Richard Dawkins' website vs. Conservapedia
Atheism 6,917,254
Atheism 6,917,254
== Richard Dawkins' website vs. Conservapedia ==
== Richard Dawkins and his website vs. Conservapedia ==
''See also:'' [[Richard Dawkins and women]]
''See also:'' [[Richard Dawkins and women]]
Prior to Elevatorgate, [[Monica Shores]]' ''Ms. Magazine'' article titled ''Will “New Atheism” Make Room For Women?'' criticized the News Atheism movement for being [[sexism|sexist]].<ref name="msmagazine.com">[http://msmagazine.com/blog/2010/11/01/will-new-atheism-make-room-for-women/ ''Will “New Atheism” Make Room For Women''] by Monica Shores, ''Ms. Magazine'', 2010</ref> She also cited [[Conservapedia]] in her article and indicated: "The lack of lady presence is so visible that Conservapedia commented on it by noting that [[Richard Dawkins Foundation for Reason and Science website|Dawkins’ website]] overwhelmingly attracts male visitors."<ref name="msmagazine.com"/>
Prior to the [[Elevatorgate]] scandal, which was a scandal involving Richard Dawkins vs. feminists, [[Monica Shores]]' ''Ms. Magazine'' article titled ''Will “[[New Atheism]]” Make Room For Women?'' criticized the News Atheism movement for being [[sexism|sexist]].<ref name="msmagazine.com">[http://msmagazine.com/blog/2010/11/01/will-new-atheism-make-room-for-women/ ''Will “New Atheism” Make Room For Women''] by Monica Shores, ''Ms. Magazine'', 2010</ref> She also cited [[Conservapedia]] in her article and indicated: "The lack of lady presence is so visible that Conservapedia commented on it by noting that [[Richard Dawkins Foundation for Reason and Science website|Dawkins’ website]] overwhelmingly attracts male visitors."<ref name="msmagazine.com"/>
Conservapedia put Richard Dawkins on the feminist radar!
Post [[Elevatorgate]] controversy, the [[New Atheism|new atheist]] [[Richard Dawkins]] has seen a significant loss of public influence (see: [[Richard Dawkins' loss of influence]]).
Post [[Elevatorgate]] controversy, the [[New Atheism|new atheist]] [[Richard Dawkins]] has seen a significant loss of public influence (see: [[Richard Dawkins' loss of influence]]).