Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
162 bytes added ,  00:02, December 22, 2021
Line 52: Line 52:  
In 1882, factionalism divided the Pennsylvania GOP and handed a victory to Democrats when roughly 40,000 [[Liberal Republican Party|Liberal Republicans]] deemed "[[Half-Breeds]]" by the Republican machine bolted from the party in the gubernatorial election that year to vote for an "Independent Republican" candidate.<ref name=explorepabio/> Several years later in the mid-1880s, Cameron's leadership role in the Pennsylvania machine was replaced by that of Matthew S. Quay, who proved to surpass the former in influence and capabilities.<ref name=quaybio/>
 
In 1882, factionalism divided the Pennsylvania GOP and handed a victory to Democrats when roughly 40,000 [[Liberal Republican Party|Liberal Republicans]] deemed "[[Half-Breeds]]" by the Republican machine bolted from the party in the gubernatorial election that year to vote for an "Independent Republican" candidate.<ref name=explorepabio/> Several years later in the mid-1880s, Cameron's leadership role in the Pennsylvania machine was replaced by that of Matthew S. Quay, who proved to surpass the former in influence and capabilities.<ref name=quaybio/>
   −
The Federal Elections Bill of 1890 introduced by conservative Republican [[Massachusetts]] senator [[Henry Cabot Lodge, Sr.]], narrowly passed the House by a party-line vote and faced a blockade in the Senate. Western liberal Republicans opposed the bill under the belief that the stance would draw support from Southern Democrats into their pro-free silver cause, while Northern Republicans such as Cameron and Quay emphasized protective tariffs.<ref>Koenig, Louis W. [https://www.encyclopedia.com/people/history/us-history-biographies/benjamin-harrison-us-president Benjamin Harrison]. ''Encyclopedia.com''. Retrieved December 21, 2021.</ref>
+
The Federal Elections Bill of 1890 introduced by conservative Republican [[Massachusetts]] senator [[Henry Cabot Lodge, Sr.]], narrowly passed the House by a party-line vote and faced a blockade in the Senate. Western liberal Republicans opposed the bill under the belief that the stance would draw support from Southern Democrats into their pro-free silver cause, while Northern Republicans such as Cameron and Quay emphasized protective tariffs.<ref>Koenig, Louis W. [https://www.encyclopedia.com/people/history/us-history-biographies/benjamin-harrison-us-president Benjamin Harrison]. ''Encyclopedia.com''. Retrieved December 21, 2021.</ref> Although the Pennsylvania senatorial duo did not oppose the legislation, they prioritized the tariff issue and did comparably little to help pass the Lodge bill.
    
In the 1896–97 elections, Cameron declined to run for another term due to the increasing intraparty power of Quay.<ref name=nytobit/>
 
In the 1896–97 elections, Cameron declined to run for another term due to the increasing intraparty power of Quay.<ref name=nytobit/>
SkipCaptcha
35,519

edits

Navigation menu