Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search

Talk:Entropy (view source)

Revision as of 05:52, March 5, 2007

278 bytes added ,  05:52, March 5, 2007
no edit summary
Line 2: Line 2:     
I'm not a young earth creationist, but isn't this one of the things on Answers in Genesis's list of "arguments that should not be used"? [[User:MountainDew|MountainDew]] 00:41, 5 March 2007 (EST)
 
I'm not a young earth creationist, but isn't this one of the things on Answers in Genesis's list of "arguments that should not be used"? [[User:MountainDew|MountainDew]] 00:41, 5 March 2007 (EST)
 +
 +
I don't like the label "creationist", but I find the entropy argument very persuasive.  Maybe it depends on how the argument is presented, but the [[Second Law of Thermodynamics]] is fundamental and never, ever violated.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 00:52, 5 March 2007 (EST)
Aschlafly
Anthony, Irenaeus, Siteadmin, apieditor, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
126,393

edits

Retrieved from "https://www.conservapedia.com/Special:MobileDiff/18270"

Navigation menu