Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 70: Line 70:  
:::::::::::::''"Potentially, the most dangerous scenario would be a grand coalition of China, Russia, and perhaps Iran, an “antihegemonic” coalition united not by ideology but by complementary grievances. It would be reminiscent in scale and scope of the challenge once posed by the Sino-Soviet bloc, though this time China would likely be the leader and Russia the follower."''
 
:::::::::::::''"Potentially, the most dangerous scenario would be a grand coalition of China, Russia, and perhaps Iran, an “antihegemonic” coalition united not by ideology but by complementary grievances. It would be reminiscent in scale and scope of the challenge once posed by the Sino-Soviet bloc, though this time China would likely be the leader and Russia the follower."''
 
::::::::::::Additionally, Brzezinski states that the only alliance combinations anywhere in the world that would be even more "dangerous" for the US would be a Russo-EU alliance and a Sino-Japanese alliance. Now, wait a minute. Wouldn't preventing those alliances serve as a justification for our ongoing meddling in Europe and East Asia? Hmmm...--[[User:Geopolitician|Geopolitician]] ([[User talk:Geopolitician|talk]]) 13:35, January 6, 2022 (EST)
 
::::::::::::Additionally, Brzezinski states that the only alliance combinations anywhere in the world that would be even more "dangerous" for the US would be a Russo-EU alliance and a Sino-Japanese alliance. Now, wait a minute. Wouldn't preventing those alliances serve as a justification for our ongoing meddling in Europe and East Asia? Hmmm...--[[User:Geopolitician|Geopolitician]] ([[User talk:Geopolitician|talk]]) 13:35, January 6, 2022 (EST)
 +
:::::::::::::That Eurasian Heartland stuff is really interesting. I'm going to end the discussion off here, but I really appreciate it. Thank you, sincerely. ---[[User:BernieandTrumpFan|BernieandTrumpFan]] ([[User talk:BernieandTrumpFan|talk]]) 20:55, January 6, 2022 (EST)

Navigation menu