Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
118 bytes added ,  03:05, May 30, 2007
no edit summary
Line 14: Line 14:  
There you go again, Poor Ed, setting up straw dogs of imaginary events that never happened to criticize liberals in your akward way. Niggardly? Pathetic. Where I come from calling a woman a whore is not acceptable. Obviously in your universe it is just an amusing joke, and criticism of it is termed a "witch hunt". And if you don't know why calling an African-American woman "nappy headed" is racist, you are not qualified to edit your own diary, not to mention an "encyclopedia".
 
There you go again, Poor Ed, setting up straw dogs of imaginary events that never happened to criticize liberals in your akward way. Niggardly? Pathetic. Where I come from calling a woman a whore is not acceptable. Obviously in your universe it is just an amusing joke, and criticism of it is termed a "witch hunt". And if you don't know why calling an African-American woman "nappy headed" is racist, you are not qualified to edit your own diary, not to mention an "encyclopedia".
 
:It's perfectly acceptable in the billion dollar industry of Rap music, which CBS profits from distributing to young folks.  [[User:RobS|RobS]] 21:54, 29 May 2007 (EDT)
 
:It's perfectly acceptable in the billion dollar industry of Rap music, which CBS profits from distributing to young folks.  [[User:RobS|RobS]] 21:54, 29 May 2007 (EDT)
 +
 +
I see. Because Rap music commits an abomination, it is okay for you to do the same in Conservapedia. Hmmm. NitramNos
373

edits

Navigation menu