SkipCaptcha
334
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 8:
Line 8: + +
no edit summary
On August 11, 2021, a judge with the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia denied to dismiss defamation suits brought by Dominion, against Lindell and others, over claims made relating to Dominion’s alleged involvement in fraud during the 2020 presidential election.
On August 11, 2021, a judge with the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia denied to dismiss defamation suits brought by Dominion, against Lindell and others, over claims made relating to Dominion’s alleged involvement in fraud during the 2020 presidential election.
<ref>https://www.lawfareblog.com/dc-district-court-rules-dominion-defamation-lawsuits-can-proceed</ref>
<ref>https://www.lawfareblog.com/dc-district-court-rules-dominion-defamation-lawsuits-can-proceed</ref>
US District Judge Carl J. Nichols ordered all parties to the lawsuit to participate in “discussions about a consolidated discovery schedule.” Lindell and MyPillow met and conferred with the plaintiffs over Zoom and by email in late 2021. On January 6, 2022, they decided not to participate in the scheduling conferences. Lindell's lawyers said they were planning to appeal to the Supreme Court, Nichols' rejection of their motion to dismiss and that they wouldn't participate in discovery until then. <ref>https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.dcd.225699/gov.uscourts.dcd.225699.63.0.pdf</ref> <ref>https://www.businessinsider.com/mike-lindell-wont-give-dominion-discovery-material-in-defamation-suit-2022-1</ref>
==Mike Lyndell v. Dominion==
==Mike Lyndell v. Dominion==