386
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 52:
Line 52: + + + +
This article should redirect to Abstinence
::::::I came here to learn what "conservatives" think, as they claimed it can't be put in Wikipedia. So far, I'm still confused - sex is taboo, but [[marriage]] includes a wide range of styles with multiple partners, and [[homosexuality]] can be discussed too. I cannot understand a "conservative" position that allows discussion of multiple partners of both sexes, but can't stomach an article about monogamous sex with a spouse. I haven't contributed much, because I just can't get my head around what might be acceptable. The [[divorce]] article is unlikely to help anyone who is going through it, or who's parents or friend's parents are, either! --[[User:Scott|Scott]] 18:00, 19 March 2007 (EDT)
::::::I came here to learn what "conservatives" think, as they claimed it can't be put in Wikipedia. So far, I'm still confused - sex is taboo, but [[marriage]] includes a wide range of styles with multiple partners, and [[homosexuality]] can be discussed too. I cannot understand a "conservative" position that allows discussion of multiple partners of both sexes, but can't stomach an article about monogamous sex with a spouse. I haven't contributed much, because I just can't get my head around what might be acceptable. The [[divorce]] article is unlikely to help anyone who is going through it, or who's parents or friend's parents are, either! --[[User:Scott|Scott]] 18:00, 19 March 2007 (EDT)
::::::* I'm sure that Wikipedia does not allow an article on [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Religion_and_sexuality religion and sexuality], since it would offend our liberal sensitivities :o) [[User:JzG|JzG]] 19:09, 21 March 2007 (EDT)
::::::* I'm sure that Wikipedia does not allow an article on [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Religion_and_sexuality religion and sexuality], since it would offend our liberal sensitivities :o) [[User:JzG|JzG]] 19:09, 21 March 2007 (EDT)
== This article should redirect to [[Abstinence]] ==
Redirecting to [[Gender]] doesn't make that much sense, now that I think about it. Any discussion of s-e-x should begin first and foremost with abstinence.--[[User:Conservateur|Conservateur]] 13:11, 30 May 2007 (EDT)