157
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
mLine 12:
Line 12: + + + + + + +
no edit summary
Reverting: Already understood soul can not be viewed by what is stated above. Giving a list of devices that can not find it is therefore meaningless. Concept of the brain taking over the roles of the soul not cited; would need specific back up. Had already merged in thoughts on when soul enters the body. Little else of use except to be controversial to be controversial. [[User:Learn together|Learn together]] 13:37, 30 May 2007 (EDT)
Reverting: Already understood soul can not be viewed by what is stated above. Giving a list of devices that can not find it is therefore meaningless. Concept of the brain taking over the roles of the soul not cited; would need specific back up. Had already merged in thoughts on when soul enters the body. Little else of use except to be controversial to be controversial. [[User:Learn together|Learn together]] 13:37, 30 May 2007 (EDT)
:Oh, revert war, fun! I wont just rever though, I want to have a think about this and see if I can make what I wrote a bit clearer. But...
* I will try to be clearer regarding the implications of the non-falsifiability of the soul, and the idea that the absence of evidence after an intense search can be strong evidence of absence, even though it can never be absolute proof.
* I will see what I can dig up for citations on the brain thing.
* Thanks for the merge, but I was a little annoyed to see how much it shrunk.
* I was being controversial in the hope of provoking some debate here. The nature of the soul is a rather vaguely-defined thing, I would like to see some discussion take place over it.
- Suricou