Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
87 bytes removed ,  20:11, February 3, 2022
Line 62: Line 62:  
===Anti-Israel stance===
 
===Anti-Israel stance===
   −
When it comes to Israel,<ref>[https://whatyoushouldknowaboutisrael.org/questions-for-amnesty Questions For Amnesty], Feb 2022.
+
When it comes to Israel, it does not act as human rights organization<ref>[https://www.ngo-monitor.org/ngos/amnesty_international/ Amnesty International (AI)], NGO Monitor,
 +
February 01, 2022.<blockquote>
 +
Activities
   −
<blockquote>Basic Questions
+
Claims to be “Independent of any government, political ideology, economic interest or religion… it does not support or oppose any government or political system.”
−
For Amnesty
+
 
 +
Disproportionately singles out Israel for condemnation, focusing solely on the conflict with the Palestinians, misrepresenting the complexity of the conflict, and ignoring more severe human rights violations in the region.
 +
 
 +
Amnesty International operates an office in Jerusalem under the leadership of Saleh Hijazi, former Public Relations officer for the Palestinian Authority’s Office of the Ministry of Planning in Ramallah.</blockquote></ref> but as a hateful propaganda tool recycling old/new lies.<ref>[https://whatyoushouldknowaboutisrael.org/questions-for-amnesty Questions For Amnesty], Feb 2022.
 +
 
 +
<blockquote><font size=1>Basic Questions For Amnesty
    
 
 
 
Line 101: Line 108:     
When an Arab judge sentences a former Israeli president to jail -- well, bit of a strange 'apartheid', I think you'd have to agree.
 
When an Arab judge sentences a former Israeli president to jail -- well, bit of a strange 'apartheid', I think you'd have to agree.
−
        Line 108: Line 114:     
This is the exact opposite to apartheid in South Africa - where the government actually introduced and passed racist legislation!
 
This is the exact opposite to apartheid in South Africa - where the government actually introduced and passed racist legislation!
−
         
<i>3 - If what you claim is true, why do  Arabs and Israelis receive the same treatment, and are together in the same hospitals?</i>
 
<i>3 - If what you claim is true, why do  Arabs and Israelis receive the same treatment, and are together in the same hospitals?</i>
−
        Line 125: Line 129:     
Now contrast this with South Africa, where Black people were given limited access to health care.
 
Now contrast this with South Africa, where Black people were given limited access to health care.
−
  −
        Line 132: Line 134:       −
The Joint List is an example of this. They received 13 seats in the 2015 Israeli election. Arabs have equal voting rights.
+
The Joint List is an example of this. They received 13 seats in the 2015 Israeli election. Arabs have equal voting rights.)
−
 
  −
 
      
In South Africa, Black people during apartheid were not allowed to participate in the political process.
 
In South Africa, Black people during apartheid were not allowed to participate in the political process.
−
  −
         
<i>5 -  If what you claim is true,  why can Arab citizens seek redress through the courts and government if they feel they have been treated unfairly?</i>
 
<i>5 -  If what you claim is true,  why can Arab citizens seek redress through the courts and government if they feel they have been treated unfairly?</i>
−
        Line 154: Line 151:     
Israeli Arabs  have more rights than they do in the Gaza Strip or the West Bank, controlled by Hamas and the Palestinian Authority respectively.
 
Israeli Arabs  have more rights than they do in the Gaza Strip or the West Bank, controlled by Hamas and the Palestinian Authority respectively.
−
  −
        Line 166: Line 161:     
Furthermore, according to a poll done by Harvard University, 77 per cent of Arab citizens living in Israel would rather live there than any other country in the world. 
 
Furthermore, according to a poll done by Harvard University, 77 per cent of Arab citizens living in Israel would rather live there than any other country in the world. 
−
         
If these citizens were experiencing "apartheid," why are so many of them so supportive of Israel...? 
 
If these citizens were experiencing "apartheid," why are so many of them so supportive of Israel...? 
−
        Line 179: Line 172:       −
 Here are the names of just two: Mohammad Kabiya and  Lorena Khateeb,  
+
Here are the names of just two: Mohammad Kabiya and  Lorena Khateeb,  
−
 
  −
 
        Line 187: Line 178:       −
 Why do all the Christians, Muslims, Arabs, Druze, and B'hais choose to live there?
+
Why do all the Christians, Muslims, Arabs, Druze, and B'hais choose to live there?
      Line 199: Line 190:       −
We look forward to your response.
+
We look forward to your response.</font></blockquote></ref>
−
 
  −
 
  −
 
  −
Sincerely
  −
 
  −
Tabatha Caplan
  −
Founder: What You Should Know About Israel
  −
www.whatyoushouldknowaboutisrael.org</blockquote></ref>
  −
 
  −
 
  −
<ref>[https://www.ngo-monitor.org/ngos/amnesty_international/ Amnesty International (AI)], NGO Monitor,
  −
February 01, 2022.<blockquote>
  −
Activities
     −
Claims to be “Independent of any government, political ideology, economic interest or religion… it does not support or oppose any government or political system.”
     −
Disproportionately singles out Israel for condemnation, focusing solely on the conflict with the Palestinians, misrepresenting the complexity of the conflict, and ignoring more severe human rights violations in the region.
     −
Amnesty International operates an office in Jerusalem under the leadership of Saleh Hijazi, former Public Relations officer for the Palestinian Authority’s Office of the Ministry of Planning in Ramallah.</blockquote></ref> it does not act as human rights organization but as a hateful propaganda tool .
      
Just about everything Israel does to defend itself is 'illegal' in the eyes of Amnesty International. During the [[Israel]] [[Lebanese]] conflict of 2006, Amnesty was accusing Israel of war crimes. According to the [[Jerusalem Post]]'s [[Alan Dershowitz]], through restraint, Israel was able to minimize the number of civilian casualties in Lebanon, but Amnesty criticized nevertheless. Yet on [[Hezbollah]]'s best efforts to embed itself in population centers and to use civilians as human shields, Amnesty said nothing. "Bigotry, pure and simple.", said Dershowitz.<ref>[https://www.jpost.com/servlet/Satellite?cid=1154525974885&pagename=JPost/JPArticle/ShowFull Amnesty Int'l redefines 'war crimes'] The Jerusalem Post, Aug 30, 2006</ref>
 
Just about everything Israel does to defend itself is 'illegal' in the eyes of Amnesty International. During the [[Israel]] [[Lebanese]] conflict of 2006, Amnesty was accusing Israel of war crimes. According to the [[Jerusalem Post]]'s [[Alan Dershowitz]], through restraint, Israel was able to minimize the number of civilian casualties in Lebanon, but Amnesty criticized nevertheless. Yet on [[Hezbollah]]'s best efforts to embed itself in population centers and to use civilians as human shields, Amnesty said nothing. "Bigotry, pure and simple.", said Dershowitz.<ref>[https://www.jpost.com/servlet/Satellite?cid=1154525974885&pagename=JPost/JPArticle/ShowFull Amnesty Int'l redefines 'war crimes'] The Jerusalem Post, Aug 30, 2006</ref>
Block, SkipCaptcha, Upload, Automoderated users, edit, Moderators, protect
27,872

edits

Navigation menu