Block, SkipCaptcha, Automoderated users, edit
7,846
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 251:
Line 251: + +
→Recent reverts: reply
::::Experimental vaccine? Do you mean new? Alleged scientific research? The efficacy of vaccines has been proven over many years. Conservapedia articles discredit the reverts made here by [[User:Northwest|Northwest]], so where is this liberal propaganda he sees?. Also why is an obviously redundant sentence in the lead restored?--[[User:Jackin the box|Jackin the box]] ([[User talk:Jackin the box|talk]]) 11:56, February 20, 2022 (EST)
::::Experimental vaccine? Do you mean new? Alleged scientific research? The efficacy of vaccines has been proven over many years. Conservapedia articles discredit the reverts made here by [[User:Northwest|Northwest]], so where is this liberal propaganda he sees?. Also why is an obviously redundant sentence in the lead restored?--[[User:Jackin the box|Jackin the box]] ([[User talk:Jackin the box|talk]]) 11:56, February 20, 2022 (EST)
:::::Except that the CCP flu "vaccines" are not real vaccines at all, but experimental and untested mRNA-based gene therapy drugs containing dangerous ingredients and byproducts of abortion (whether directly or indirectly), which you're choosing to ignore in favor of worshiping at the temple of Fauci (the pseudo-science-embracing/real science-denying fraudulent "doctor" who's purely in it for the money and Democrat brownie points). [[User:Northwest|Northwest]] ([[User talk:Northwest|talk]]) 12:07, February 20, 2022 (EST)