Block, Siteadmin, SkipCaptcha, Upload, Automoderated users, delete, edit, move, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, protect, rollback, Administrators, template
294,396
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 28:
Line 28: − === Diseases subject to Federal isolation and quarantine law === − − By Executive Order of the President − − *[[Cholera]] − *[[Diphtheria]] − *Infectious [[tuberculosis]] − *[[Plague]] − *[[Smallpox]] − *[[Yellow fever]] − *[[Viral hemorrhagic fever]]s (like[[ Ebola]]) − *Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome ([[SARS]], [[MERS]], [[COVID-19]]) − *[[Flu]] that can cause a pandemic. See also: [[ Influenza#Spanish Flu Pandemic: 1918-1919]] −
→Diseases subject to Federal isolation and quarantine law
A study released in February 2022 by [[Johns Hopkins University]] confirmed "lockdowns have had little to no public health effects, while they have imposed enormous economic and social costs."<ref>https://www.investmentwatchblog.com/johns-hopkins-publishes-paper-saying-that-lockdowns-did-nothing-good-destroyed-economy-and-society/</ref>
A study released in February 2022 by [[Johns Hopkins University]] confirmed "lockdowns have had little to no public health effects, while they have imposed enormous economic and social costs."<ref>https://www.investmentwatchblog.com/johns-hopkins-publishes-paper-saying-that-lockdowns-did-nothing-good-destroyed-economy-and-society/</ref>
==UK==
==UK==
Some British scientists have admitted that their committee exploited fear in totalitarian and “unethical” ways to control people’s behavior throughout the COVID-19 pandemic. “Clearly, using fear as a means of control is not ethical,” said Gavin Morgan, a psychologist and member of the Scientific Pandemic Influenza Group on Behavior (SPI-B). “Using fear smacks of totalitarianism. It’s not an ethical stance for any modern government. By nature I am an optimistic person, but all this has given me a more pessimistic view of people.”
Some British scientists have admitted that their committee exploited fear in totalitarian and “unethical” ways to control people’s behavior throughout the COVID-19 pandemic. “Clearly, using fear as a means of control is not ethical,” said Gavin Morgan, a psychologist and member of the Scientific Pandemic Influenza Group on Behavior (SPI-B). “Using fear smacks of totalitarianism. It’s not an ethical stance for any modern government. By nature I am an optimistic person, but all this has given me a more pessimistic view of people.”