Block, SkipCaptcha, Automoderated users, edit
7,846
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 15:
Line 15: + + +
Reply to LSimons
What Dominion Voting Systems did to protect itself by smearing those who correctly accused the company of facilitating vote fraud (with evidence to back up the accusations) and resorting to [[lawfare]] against its accusers to attempt to silence them is nothing short of unethical (at the very least) as well as an attempt to simultaneously excuse, justify and deny its criminal behavior. Making excuses for Dominion's criminal actions is tantamount to supporting said actions and, by extension, supporting crime as well, which falls right into the realm of liberal POV. [[User:Northwest|Northwest]] ([[User talk:Northwest|talk]]) 21:10, March 26, 2022 (EDT)
What Dominion Voting Systems did to protect itself by smearing those who correctly accused the company of facilitating vote fraud (with evidence to back up the accusations) and resorting to [[lawfare]] against its accusers to attempt to silence them is nothing short of unethical (at the very least) as well as an attempt to simultaneously excuse, justify and deny its criminal behavior. Making excuses for Dominion's criminal actions is tantamount to supporting said actions and, by extension, supporting crime as well, which falls right into the realm of liberal POV. [[User:Northwest|Northwest]] ([[User talk:Northwest|talk]]) 21:10, March 26, 2022 (EDT)
:At least 86 judges, nominated by Democrats and Republicans, including President Donald Trump, from the lowest level state courts to the U.S. Supreme Court, rejected lawsuits filed by Trump and his supporters contesting the election result. Yet here you are brazenly insisting Dominion is exercising criminal behavior. I am not making excuses for the mythical criminal actions you are directing at Dominion. If you are correct, why didn’t Trump and his lawyers succeed at any of their lawsuits? I’d like an answer to my question. Is it alright if I post an edit to the American Thinker article that comes exclusively from their website? Or would that be ‘liberal POV’?--[[User:LSimons|LSimons]] ([[User talk:LSimons|talk]]) 23:26, March 26, 2022 (EDT)
:At least 86 judges, nominated by Democrats and Republicans, including President Donald Trump, from the lowest level state courts to the U.S. Supreme Court, rejected lawsuits filed by Trump and his supporters contesting the election result. Yet here you are brazenly insisting Dominion is exercising criminal behavior. I am not making excuses for the mythical criminal actions you are directing at Dominion. If you are correct, why didn’t Trump and his lawyers succeed at any of their lawsuits? I’d like an answer to my question. Is it alright if I post an edit to the American Thinker article that comes exclusively from their website? Or would that be ‘liberal POV’?--[[User:LSimons|LSimons]] ([[User talk:LSimons|talk]]) 23:26, March 26, 2022 (EDT)
::First off, it wasn't necessary to post the same answer on both your user talk page and mine.
::Second, all of those judges in question either willingly sided with the Democrats, were bought off by them or were intimidated by them into rejecting Trump's lawsuits because of one thing and one thing only - the Democrats, being the power-mad elitists and criminals they are and have been since 1828, wanted Trump out of the way because he stood in their way of consolidating absolute power and control over the American public and the elimination of the Constitution which limits the Democrats' power and abuse thereof - and there is ''nothing'' "mythical" about the truth regarding Dominion and its criminal actions (which, again, are well-documented despite your flimsy claims otherwise), and [[liberal denial|denying that you're making excuses for that company]] (as well as continuing to make dismissive excuses for them and brushing off the fact that you're trying to impose liberal POV on this site) does not make what you say true either. [[User:Northwest|Northwest]] ([[User talk:Northwest|talk]]) 23:40, March 26, 2022 (EDT)