Changes

Another argument against the legitimacy of this artifact is based on the account of John, as mentioned by Calvin above.  

Another argument against the legitimacy of this artifact is based on the account of John, as mentioned by Calvin above.  

{{cquote|...[Simon Peter] saw the linen cloths lying there, and the handkerchief that had been around His head, not lying with the linen cloths, but folded together in a place by itself. -<small>John 20:6-7, NKJV</small>}}

{{cquote|...[Simon Peter] saw the linen cloths lying there, and the handkerchief that had been around His head, not lying with the linen cloths, but folded together in a place by itself. -<small>{{Bible ref|John|20|6-7|version=NKJV}}</small>

This account clearly says that the cloth around his head was separate from the cloth around the rest of his body. Some translations even refer to strips of cloth which had been wrapped around him, rather than one solid cloth.

This account clearly says that the cloth around his head was separate from the cloth around the rest of his body. Some translations even refer to strips of cloth which had been wrapped around him, rather than one solid cloth.

{{cquote|[Simon Peter] saw the strips of linen lying there, as well as the cloth that had been wrapped around Jesus’ head -<small>John 20:6b-7a, NIV</small>}}

{{cquote|[Simon Peter] saw the strips of linen lying there, as well as the cloth that had been wrapped around Jesus’ head -<small>{{Bible ref|John|20|6b-7a|version=NIV}}</small>

These arguments have been used by a variety of people to say that scripture itself disproves the claims of the Catholic church.<br /><br />

These arguments have been used by a variety of people to say that scripture itself disproves the claims of the Catholic church.<br /><br />