SkipCaptcha
906
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 285:
Line 285: + +
→Comments: Possible additions to the article?
:See, here's the problem reactionary leftists don't understand; they think after Trump is removed from office, the pandemic ends, and Russia is defeated that life will return to the la-la land they enjoyed before. It's not. And their No.1 idol - science - is on the chopping block. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|Z]]</sup> 18:23, April 23, 2022 (EDT)
:See, here's the problem reactionary leftists don't understand; they think after Trump is removed from office, the pandemic ends, and Russia is defeated that life will return to the la-la land they enjoyed before. It's not. And their No.1 idol - science - is on the chopping block. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|Z]]</sup> 18:23, April 23, 2022 (EDT)
::Some possible additions? "Refusing vaccines started back in the early 1800s when the smallpox vaccine started being used in large numbers. The idea of injecting someone with a part of a cowpox blister to protect them from smallpox faced a lot of criticism. The criticism was based on sanitary, religious, and political objections. Some clergy believed that the vaccine went against their religion."
::The [[U.S. Supreme Court]] in 1905, in the Jacobson v. Massachusetts case, “set legal precedent by finding that individual liberty does not supersede actions required for the public good”. <ref>[https://www.webmd.com/vaccines/covid-19-vaccine/news/20211014/vaccine-opposition-not-new Web MD]</ref> But have there been any more recent legal cases? --[[User:Jackin the box|Jackin the box]] ([[User talk:Jackin the box|talk]]) 12:00, April 24, 2022 (EDT)
== Non-mRNAm, traditional viral vector covid vaccines ==
== Non-mRNAm, traditional viral vector covid vaccines ==
While I can understand that some are fearful of all vaccines, and others of just suspicious of [[mRNA]] COVID-19 Vaccines, I do not understand why '''non-mRNAm, traditional viral vector covid vaccines''' are not covered here. It would seem that Conservapedia recognizes the value of non-controversial vaccines in saving lives. --[[User:Jackin the box|Jackin the box]] ([[User talk:Jackin the box|talk]]) 15:37, April 12, 2022 (EDT)
While I can understand that some are fearful of all vaccines, and others of just suspicious of [[mRNA]] COVID-19 Vaccines, I do not understand why '''non-mRNAm, traditional viral vector covid vaccines''' are not covered here. It would seem that Conservapedia recognizes the value of non-controversial vaccines in saving lives. --[[User:Jackin the box|Jackin the box]] ([[User talk:Jackin the box|talk]]) 15:37, April 12, 2022 (EDT)