| Line 126: |
Line 126: |
| | :Nobody knows what a neolib is, other than some vague definition related to economic theory invented a few years to explain how socialists become capitalists and oligarchs, and make big money corporate donations to Democrats. It has nothing to do whatsoever with foreign policy or international relations. As it's being proposed here, it's a deceptive ruse to isolate all neocons into one party in an election year, again. | | :Nobody knows what a neolib is, other than some vague definition related to economic theory invented a few years to explain how socialists become capitalists and oligarchs, and make big money corporate donations to Democrats. It has nothing to do whatsoever with foreign policy or international relations. As it's being proposed here, it's a deceptive ruse to isolate all neocons into one party in an election year, again. |
| | :There is no question whatsoever that the foreign policy of the [[Obama administration]]'s second term was dominated by neocons. And that neocons led the opposition to Donald Trump throughout his candidacy and presidency. And that neocons today, led by Joe Biden and the Democrats, are in bed with Nazis. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|Z]]</sup> 19:27, April 26, 2022 (EDT) | | :There is no question whatsoever that the foreign policy of the [[Obama administration]]'s second term was dominated by neocons. And that neocons led the opposition to Donald Trump throughout his candidacy and presidency. And that neocons today, led by Joe Biden and the Democrats, are in bed with Nazis. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|Z]]</sup> 19:27, April 26, 2022 (EDT) |
| − | :You guys are stuck in a time warp. You think the definition of "neocon" ended when Baby Bush left office, and ignore Barack Obama's conversion to neoconism. Now your trying to resurrection the old hatred you all had back then. Get off it. It won't work. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|Z]]</sup> 19:30, April 26, 2022 (EDT) | + | :You guys are stuck in a time warp. You think the definition of "neocon" ended when Baby Bush left office, and ignore Barack Obama's conversion to neoconism. Now you're trying to resurrect the old hatred you all had back then. Get off it. It won't work. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|Z]]</sup> 19:30, April 26, 2022 (EDT) |
| | | | |
| | :If a Republican supports Zelensky, they're a neocon; if they don't, they're a Putin apologist. If they support Russia, they're authoritarian. If the do not speak on foreign policy at all and only on domestic issues, they are racists and bigots. Let's stop this ridiculous game you all are playing here and right now. Cause it is going nowhere inside Conservapedia this election year. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|Z]]</sup> 19:34, April 26, 2022 (EDT) | | :If a Republican supports Zelensky, they're a neocon; if they don't, they're a Putin apologist. If they support Russia, they're authoritarian. If the do not speak on foreign policy at all and only on domestic issues, they are racists and bigots. Let's stop this ridiculous game you all are playing here and right now. Cause it is going nowhere inside Conservapedia this election year. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|Z]]</sup> 19:34, April 26, 2022 (EDT) |