Block, Siteadmin, SkipCaptcha, Upload, Automoderated users, edit, protect
4,562
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 61:
Line 61: + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
→Science and climate change
One of the major problems with many scientists' conclusions about climate change is a misunderstanding of [[correlation]] versus [[causation]]. Some studies show correlations between increasing concentrations of atmospheric greenhouse gases and increasing [[precipitation]], and between human activity and atmospheric greenhouse gases, and then go so far as to conclude that humans are causing increased rain, snow, and catastrophic flooding.<ref>Gillis, Justin. "Study Links Rise in Rain and Snow to Human Actions." ''The New York Times'', February 16, 2011. https://www.nytimes.com/2011/02/17/science/earth/17extreme.html?_r=2&ref=science</ref><ref>Schiermeier, Quirin. "Increased Flood Risk Linked to Global Warming." 2011. ''Nature'', Vol. 470, p. 316. http://www.nature.com/news/2011/110216/full/470316a.html</ref> Correlation does not imply causation. This is especially true considering the relatively short periods of data used (a few decades at most) compared to the Earth's age, and the fact that weather patterns have been cyclic throughout history (see [[climate cycles]]).
One of the major problems with many scientists' conclusions about climate change is a misunderstanding of [[correlation]] versus [[causation]]. Some studies show correlations between increasing concentrations of atmospheric greenhouse gases and increasing [[precipitation]], and between human activity and atmospheric greenhouse gases, and then go so far as to conclude that humans are causing increased rain, snow, and catastrophic flooding.<ref>Gillis, Justin. "Study Links Rise in Rain and Snow to Human Actions." ''The New York Times'', February 16, 2011. https://www.nytimes.com/2011/02/17/science/earth/17extreme.html?_r=2&ref=science</ref><ref>Schiermeier, Quirin. "Increased Flood Risk Linked to Global Warming." 2011. ''Nature'', Vol. 470, p. 316. http://www.nature.com/news/2011/110216/full/470316a.html</ref> Correlation does not imply causation. This is especially true considering the relatively short periods of data used (a few decades at most) compared to the Earth's age, and the fact that weather patterns have been cyclic throughout history (see [[climate cycles]]).
Climate change is neither anthropogenic nor apocalyptic 95% of greenhouse gases are water vapor 3.6% of these gases are CO2.
Of the gases in the atmosphere 0.04% is CO2, only 0.01% is generated by humans. All greenhouse gases represent 1% of the gases.
CO2 is the gas of life, it is vital for life, in fact the earth has greened between 1982 and 2014 by 15% and the Sahara has shrunk by 300 thousand km2.
In the middle ages there was a warm period on earth, instead of being detrimental, it was beneficial, as fewer people died from cold (cold kills 20 times more than heat), the greatest cathedrals and castles in history were built (including Notre Dame).
In the last 8 glaciations CO2 has been at its maximum level and in the warmings at its minimum.
Between 1945 and 1970 the temperature decreased as the world became more and more industrialized.
The current warming has been the weakest since the last 10,000 years.
The sun and the Earth's oscillations (Milanković cycles) are the main causes of climate change, scientists have found a correlation.
The environmentalism business moves 1.3 trillion dollars.
Is it worth sending the economy down the drain?
In Germany, electricity has risen by 215% for using "renewable" energies.
Prominent personalities have spoken out on the matter:
John L. Casey, nasa scientist has said that climate change is the "biggest scam".
Patrick Moore, co-founder of GreenPeace talks about this being a scare campaign to steal more funds from taxpayers.
Dr. Ottmar Endenhofer said in 2010 "We at the IPCC de facto redistribute the world's wealth with climate policies..." "One must free oneself from the illusion that international climate policy is about environmentalism. This is no longer about environmentalism."
In the past 41 climate "experts" have made erroneous predictions about environmental catastrophes.
The water level is not going to rise 3 meters as predicted, the Archimedes Principle says that ice has the same density as water, it is not able to rise much when the ice melts.
Who started with the myth of 97% of scientists agreeing that "the Earth is warming and human emissions of greenhouse gases are the main cause" is John Cook of the Global Change Institute in Australia, "main cause" meaning over 50%, but an analysis reveals that it is only 2%.
To get to 97% he added papers that explicitly said there is anthropogenic climate change, without saying how much of it was anthropogenic and added papers that said there is climate change, without saying it is anthropogenic although he could say implicitly.<ref>[https://odysee.com/Eco-Communism-The-Climate-Change-Hoax-Documentary:1 Eco-Communism The Climate Change Hoax Documentary]</ref><ref>[https://odysee.com/globalwarming:4 The Truth about Climate Change, Global Warming and United Nations Mafia - by [[Douglas Pollock]], a scientist recognized by Donald Trump]</ref><ref>[https://www.bitchute.com/video/9Vqlq3wsWrI/ GREENPEACE FOUNDER DEBUNKS CLIMATE CHANGE! (DR. PATRICK MOORE UNCUT) | LOUDER WITH CROWDER]</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.breitbart.com/environment/2019/09/20/nolte-climate-experts-are-0-41-with-their-doomsday-predictions/|title=Nolte: Climate ‘Experts’ Are 0-41 with Their Doomsday Predictions *UPDATE 0-53*|publisher=Breitbart|date=September 20, 2019}}</ref><ref>[https://www.prageru.com/video/do-97-of-climate-scientists-really-agree Do 97% of Climate Scientists Really Agree?]</ref><ref>[http://www.populartechnology.net/2013/05/97-study-falsely-classifies-scientists.html 97% Study Falsely Classifies Scientists' Papers, according to the scientists that published them]</ref><ref>[https://www.wsj.com/articles/joseph-bast-and-roy-spencer-the-myth-of-the-climate-change-97-1401145980 The Myth of the Climate Change '97%']</ref><ref>[https://www.forbes.com/sites/alexepstein/2015/01/06/97-of-climate-scientists-agree-is-100-wrong/?sh=62e148cb3f9f '97% Of Climate Scientists Agree' Is 100% Wrong]</ref><ref>[https://www.nzz.ch/klimapolitik_verteilt_das_weltvermoegen_neu-ld.1003523 Klimapolitik verteilt das Weltvermögen neu]</ref>
==History of Climate Change vs. Global Warming==
==History of Climate Change vs. Global Warming==