252
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 49:
Line 49: + +
→Anti-Semetic?
::::::*''The most devastating conclusion that I reached ... was that Casey did indeed die for nothing.''
::::::*''The most devastating conclusion that I reached ... was that Casey did indeed die for nothing.''
::::::Seems pretty clear, even after removing herself as the "face" of the movement, her allegations of a Neo-Con Jewish conspiracy have not changed. [[User:RobS|RobS]] 15:03, 1 June 2007 (EDT)
::::::Seems pretty clear, even after removing herself as the "face" of the movement, her allegations of a Neo-Con Jewish conspiracy have not changed. [[User:RobS|RobS]] 15:03, 1 June 2007 (EDT)
::::::: She says nothing about a "Neo-Con Jewish Conspiracy". Do you deny that the US supports Israel? Do you deny that Neo-Cons, and Republicans in general are a major part of that support? Disagreeing with the US's support of Israel may be wrong, it may be shortsighted, or it may even be right, but it is not, by itself, anti-semetic.
:::It seems that she feels that the US is spending US lives on the defense of the state of Israel. I don't agree with this sentiment, but there is nothing anti-semetic about it. One can quite easily dislike many things about the state of Israel, and disagree with the support that the US gives it, without having any animosity against Jews. [[User:Boomcoach|Boomcoach]] 11:04, 30 May 2007 (EDT)
:::It seems that she feels that the US is spending US lives on the defense of the state of Israel. I don't agree with this sentiment, but there is nothing anti-semetic about it. One can quite easily dislike many things about the state of Israel, and disagree with the support that the US gives it, without having any animosity against Jews. [[User:Boomcoach|Boomcoach]] 11:04, 30 May 2007 (EDT)