SkipCaptcha
24
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
mLine 4:
Line 4: − *how is "m" defined? The formula is unclear about that.
‘m’ is defined in the equation as mass of an object in kg. ‘m’ is a frequently used symbol to denote mass, such as in F = ma. If working out the units in the equation, this can also be computed. Substituting in units for E = mc^2 with ‘m’ b...
*the speed of light is probably changing over time. But according to the formula, a mass at constant energy would change precisely in inverse proportion squared of any change in the speed of light!
*the speed of light is probably changing over time. But according to the formula, a mass at constant energy would change precisely in inverse proportion squared of any change in the speed of light!
*the formula falsely implies that it is impossible for matter to increase its energy without increasing its mass in direct proportion.
*the formula falsely implies that it is impossible for matter to increase its energy without increasing its mass in direct proportion.
*if the formula were true, then why hasn't the formula led to anything of value?
*if the formula were true, then why hasn't the formula led to anything of value?