Irenaeus, Siteadmin, Check users, oversight, Administrators
351,420
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 789:
Line 789: − − == Key wiki metric == − − This is a dubious method for measuring open mindedness. Many blocked accounts are those of mindless vandals, that the aren't real editors. Also some administrators block an editor, if s/he's opinion is different from their's ( i.e. too liberal, like, for example, my choice of s/he here). --[[User:LeonardRobinson|LeonardRobinson]] ([[User talk:LeonardRobinson|talk]]) 17:32, May 28, 2022 (EDT) − :Well, it's still just an essay - one person's view on a certain subject. As to blocking, yes we are trying to reform out blocking editors to be a bit more discerning between legitimate divergent points of view, and trolls. But it can be a fine line. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|Z]]</sup> 20:27, May 28, 2022 (EDT)
Talk:Essay:Quantifying Openmindedness (view source)
Revision as of 16:15, May 30, 2022
, 16:15, May 30, 2022→Key wiki metric
*22b. Do you deny the possibility that relativity is ''not'' a correct explanation?
*22b. Do you deny the possibility that relativity is ''not'' a correct explanation?
::I believe that future developments will eventually supplant the 20<sup>th</sup> century notion of special and general relativity. But I totally accept it as the correct scientific paradigm for its time, just as Newtonian mechanics was the correct scientific paradigm for its time.
::I believe that future developments will eventually supplant the 20<sup>th</sup> century notion of special and general relativity. But I totally accept it as the correct scientific paradigm for its time, just as Newtonian mechanics was the correct scientific paradigm for its time.
==Bias?==
==Bias?==