SkipCaptcha
4,063
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 83:
Line 83: + + + +
→Pro-interventionist Democrats
:'''Question:''' So by your logic, reasoning. methodology, and standards, does that make McCarthy ''not'' a neocon RINO, or does it make Trump a neocon RINO? Thanks. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|Z]]</sup> 15:43, June 6, 2022 (EDT)
:'''Question:''' So by your logic, reasoning. methodology, and standards, does that make McCarthy ''not'' a neocon RINO, or does it make Trump a neocon RINO? Thanks. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|Z]]</sup> 15:43, June 6, 2022 (EDT)
1. I don't make these categories, but I have no problem with them and I am fine with people making them. Corrupt politicians should be categorized as globalist, RINOs, or establishment Democrats if they are so it can be made clear that we do not support them and do not like them.
2. Neither is true. All this means is that Trump is 50/50 when it comes to endorsements and can occasionally make mistakes in that area, which has happened before. Trump is not a neocon RINO because he still promotes America First policies, while McCarthy still is because he opposes those types of policies. Trump just messed up and unfortunately supported someone who is against his agenda, that is what his endorsement of McCarthy means. Also, nobody is perfect when it comes to politics, so that should be considered as well. -[[User:Mr. Nationalist|Mr. Nationalist]] ([[User talk:Mr. Nationalist|talk]]) 19:32, June 6, 2022 (EDT)