Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
32 bytes added ,  16:28, June 12, 2022
wikilinks to valid articles
Line 2: Line 2:     
[[Steven Milloy]] wrote:
 
[[Steven Milloy]] wrote:
−
:Through heavy-handed regulation of carbon dioxide emissions from power plants and other industrial sources, cap-and-trade would kill the [[coal industry]] that provides about one half of our nation's electricity. This would send energy prices skyrocketing which, in turn, would send millions of American jobs overseas, cripple our economy and make us less [[energy-independent]]. [https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2010/jan/07/beware-greens-bearing-gifts/]
+
:Through heavy-handed regulation of carbon dioxide emissions from power plants and other industrial sources, cap-and-trade would kill the [[Coal mining|coal industry]] that provides about one half of our nation's electricity. This would send energy prices skyrocketing which, in turn, would send millions of American jobs overseas, cripple our economy and make us less [[Energy Independence|energy-independent]]. [https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2010/jan/07/beware-greens-bearing-gifts/]
    
Estimates of the cost vary widely. A 15% cut in carbon emissions would cost the average American household about $1,600 a year, according to March 12, 2009, Congressional Budget Office testimony. Climate legislation passed by the House in June offsets most of the cost to consumers by returning some of the revenues to offset any significant spike in electricity costs.  
 
Estimates of the cost vary widely. A 15% cut in carbon emissions would cost the average American household about $1,600 a year, according to March 12, 2009, Congressional Budget Office testimony. Climate legislation passed by the House in June offsets most of the cost to consumers by returning some of the revenues to offset any significant spike in electricity costs.  
SkipCaptcha, Automoderated users, edit
827

edits

Navigation menu