Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
m
Whinny Article
Line 171: Line 171:     
: Yes, that is a superb point.  I've suspected as much, because often there will be less resistance to the bias in non-US articles.  Lord willing, let's expose this bias and please post specific examples here that I can incorporate in the entry.  Thanks.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 00:53, 21 May 2007 (EDT)
 
: Yes, that is a superb point.  I've suspected as much, because often there will be less resistance to the bias in non-US articles.  Lord willing, let's expose this bias and please post specific examples here that I can incorporate in the entry.  Thanks.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 00:53, 21 May 2007 (EDT)
 +
 +
== Whinny Article ==
 +
 +
Wow, what a whinny article.  It has almost no truth to it, and most of it is greatly exagerated in the most obscene way.  It needs to be rewritten or  completely removed in my opinion.
6

edits

Navigation menu