213
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 22:
Line 22: + + + + +
no edit summary
:Oh, cool! I never knew that. That's a good idea for books on further reading. I just did a research documentary on this topic, and I have loads of stuff I could list. (I won't be to excessive) Funny I didn't already know that. [[User:Mskreuz|Mskreuz]] 16:47, 1 June 2007 (EDT)
:Oh, cool! I never knew that. That's a good idea for books on further reading. I just did a research documentary on this topic, and I have loads of stuff I could list. (I won't be to excessive) Funny I didn't already know that. [[User:Mskreuz|Mskreuz]] 16:47, 1 June 2007 (EDT)
==Expanse of the Crisis Section==
I'm looking for opinions on this. I was looking at this section of the article (Section Title added by me just for clarification.) Not to be rude or anything, but after a lot of research this year a lot of those statments were either really questionable, strangely interpreted facts (IMHO), or wrong. (I do realize that part of the interpretation is due to an individual and their bias, but I really can't understand how they could be so different.) I'm sure anybody who has an extended view on this topic would understand. I was going to try to edit it, but I realized it'd take a lot of work. Would it be at all appropriate to just chop it? I don't want to be out of line or rude, but a lot of that stuff just doesn't seem right.
Thanks! [[User:Mskreuz|Mskreuz]] 21:06, 2 June 2007 (EDT)