SkipCaptcha
101
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 477:
Line 477: + + + + + + +
Talk:Biblical scientific foreknowledge (view source)
Revision as of 18:57, August 5, 2022
, 18:57, August 5, 2022→Anaethestics: new section
==Howard Gardner's theory of multiple intelligences==
==Howard Gardner's theory of multiple intelligences==
This article could point out that when Saint Paul writes about the different spiritual gifts (I think it was in one of his epistles to the Corinthians) he was predicting Howard Gardner's theory of multiple intelligences. [[User:Carltonio|Carltonio]] ([[User talk:Carltonio|talk]]) 15:44, 22 November 2019 (EST)
This article could point out that when Saint Paul writes about the different spiritual gifts (I think it was in one of his epistles to the Corinthians) he was predicting Howard Gardner's theory of multiple intelligences. [[User:Carltonio|Carltonio]] ([[User talk:Carltonio|talk]]) 15:44, 22 November 2019 (EST)
== Anaethestics ==
I find the following sentence confused and thus very confusing:
::Had scientists and physicians been more [[Essay:Quantifying Openmindedness|openminded]] about Genesis 2:21 (perhaps they had considered it a miracle, and thus impossible for humans to achieve), they may have discovered anesthesia far sooner, and saved many more lives."
God was performing a miracle. And part of God's plan for humanity seems to have been that we would learn over a long period of time. The idea that science and scientists reject what the Bible says is nonsense. Rather God speaks differently to modern people whereas He was speaking to nomadic tribesmen in the Bible. He now speaks to an entirely different audience. The Bible is of great importance but God is the '''author of science'' and its modern discoveries also. To suggest otherwise is blasphemous according my understanding of religious faith. Please fix!! --[[User:RobLeonardWoo|RobLeonardWoo]] ([[User talk:RobLeonardWoo|talk]]) 14:57, August 5, 2022 (EDT)