Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 490: Line 490:     
:Maybe the argument is failure to acknowledge God's sovereignty contaminates everything. Sure, someone may argue, "What about Prof. such-and-such who discovered treatment for XYZ disease? He was an atheist."  That has to be measured against him (or they) being held up as a role model for [[God denier]]s and God haters, and the damage human [[pride]] has done to the species. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|Ich bin ein breakfast taco]]</sup> 18:29, August 6, 2022 (EDT)
 
:Maybe the argument is failure to acknowledge God's sovereignty contaminates everything. Sure, someone may argue, "What about Prof. such-and-such who discovered treatment for XYZ disease? He was an atheist."  That has to be measured against him (or they) being held up as a role model for [[God denier]]s and God haters, and the damage human [[pride]] has done to the species. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|Ich bin ein breakfast taco]]</sup> 18:29, August 6, 2022 (EDT)
 +
 +
::Even an atheist scientists can be doing God's work, do you not agre?  Most of the evil over the centuries has been caused by religious organizations and human greed not science. Where science has caused harm it has been mostly business men and politicians, along with the profit motif, that has been to blame, whatever, the faith of the scientists involved may have been. Also, it is worth noting the profound insights found in other religious texts, especially Buddhism.  An atheist scientist who is awed by God's creation is closer to God than many who claim they are Christians, but who really worship materialism.--[[User:RobLeonardWoo|RobLeonardWoo]] ([[User talk:RobLeonardWoo|talk]]) 19:40, August 6, 2022 (EDT).
 +
 +
 +
 +
 +
 +
 +
 +
 +
 +
 +
 +
 +
 +
 +
 +
;
SkipCaptcha
101

edits

Navigation menu