Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
no edit summary
Line 495: Line 495:  
:::Interesting hypothesis. My determination: It's flawed. And for the sake of argument, I'm not going to argue it. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|Ich bin ein breakfast taco]]</sup> 20:39, August 6, 2022 (EDT)
 
:::Interesting hypothesis. My determination: It's flawed. And for the sake of argument, I'm not going to argue it. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|Ich bin ein breakfast taco]]</sup> 20:39, August 6, 2022 (EDT)
    +
No one has yet explained to me the point of this illogical article.
    +
(1) Why would God provide foreknowledge of things to the Israelites that have yet to be discovered?
 +
(2) Why criticize scientists for not making discoveries sooner, when this was clearly God's intention that humankind would over aeons do this?
 +
(3) God represents perfection whereas scientists only strifes for perfection and  cannot be criticized for failing, if they acts in good faith.
 +
(4) Religion has frequently opposed many scientific discoveries that are claimed here as biblical foreknowledge.
 +
(5) Maybe the article ends up implying God that made the mistake of not revealing, at the beginning, what science has discovered?
    +
Why is the article needed: to bash scientists? –or  to to criticize God for not giving Adam and Eve access to the marvels of 20th century technology?
   −
 
+
This article is utterly illogical.  Delete it or get someone who understands theology to rewrite.
−
 
+
A genuine '''intelligent''' article on the dangers of worshipping of science to the detriment of spiritual values is needed, not this pseudo, fake "philosophy"/"theology".--[[User:RobLeonardWoo|RobLeonardWoo]] ([[User talk:RobLeonardWoo|talk]]) 12:59, August 7, 2022 (EDT)
−
 
  −
 
       
SkipCaptcha
101

edits

Navigation menu