Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
→‎Construction of ancient sky-high structures: A Parthian shot? We see lots of those here. Until the 1900s some thought skyscrapers were impossible. Not those who read the Bible with an open mind.Leaving this discussion with a proverbial
Line 525: Line 525:     
I do not understand why this section was restored. The Bible recorded an historical fact and modern archeology has confirmed this. What has this to do with "scientific foreknowledge? Does the Truth of the Bible need to be confirmed?  I don't understand the purpose of this compendium of biblical trivia. But I will remove this page from my watch list! --[[User:RobLeonardWoo|RobLeonardWoo]] ([[User talk:RobLeonardWoo|talk]]) 14:37, August 8, 2022 (EDT)
 
I do not understand why this section was restored. The Bible recorded an historical fact and modern archeology has confirmed this. What has this to do with "scientific foreknowledge? Does the Truth of the Bible need to be confirmed?  I don't understand the purpose of this compendium of biblical trivia. But I will remove this page from my watch list! --[[User:RobLeonardWoo|RobLeonardWoo]] ([[User talk:RobLeonardWoo|talk]]) 14:37, August 8, 2022 (EDT)
−
:Leaving this discussion with a proverbial [[Parthian shot]]?  We see lots of those here.  Until the 1900s some thought skyscrapers were impossible.  Not those who read the [[Bible]] with an open mind.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] ([[User talk:Aschlafly|talk]]) 02:44, August 9, 2022 (EDT)
+
:Leaving this discussion with a proverbial [[Parthian shot]]?  We see lots of those here.  Until the 1900s some thought skyscrapers were impossible.  Not those who read the [[Bible]] with an open mind.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]]
Anthony, Irenaeus, Siteadmin, apieditor, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
126,195

edits

Navigation menu