Irenaeus, Siteadmin, Check users, oversight, Administrators
351,411
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 21:
Line 21: + + + +
→British Humanist Association's withdrawal out of agreed upon debate with the Christian apologist William Lane Craig
“Rather than hurling [[Ad hominem|ad hominem]] attacks on Craig from their bunkers, it would be good to see these figures come forward to rationally defend the atheism they publicly espouse.”<ref>http://www.churchtimes.co.uk/content.asp?id=116718</ref>}}
“Rather than hurling [[Ad hominem|ad hominem]] attacks on Craig from their bunkers, it would be good to see these figures come forward to rationally defend the atheism they publicly espouse.”<ref>http://www.churchtimes.co.uk/content.asp?id=116718</ref>}}
== ==
[[File:British Humanist Society Google referral traffic SEMRush 8-11-2022.jpg]]
== See also ==
== See also ==
*[[Atheism and cowardice]]
*[[Atheism and cowardice]]