Changes

{{Move|Respect for Marriage Act}}

{{Move|Respect for Marriage Act}}

The '''Respect for Marriage Act''' is an ironically-named, anti-family and unconstitutional act that would allow the [[United States Congress]] to further undermine [[traditional marriage]] (which had already been affected by the illegal ''[[Obergefell v. Hodges]]'' ruling of 2015 by the then-liberal dominated [[United States Supreme Court]]) by codifying [[same-sex "marriage"]] as "settled law" federally.  The [[Democrat]]-majority House of Representatives voted for this act on July 19, 2022.  All of the Democrats voted Yes for this act along with 47 [[RINO]] Republicans.  Surprisingly, [[Scott Perry]] and [[Kat Cammack]] voted for this act.<ref>https://www.yahoo.com/now/heres-47-republicans-voted-marriage-214200413.html</ref>

The '''Respect for Marriage Act''' is an ironically-named, anti-family and unconstitutional act that would allow the [[United States Congress]] to further undermine [[traditional marriage]] (which had already been affected by the illegal ''[[Obergefell v. Hodges]]'' ruling of 2015 by the then-liberal dominated [[United States Supreme Court]]) by codifying [[same-sex "marriage"]] as "settled law" federally.  The [[Democrat]]-majority House of Representatives voted for this act on July 19, 2022.  All of the Democrats voted Yes for this act along with 47 Republicans.  Surprisingly, [[Scott Perry]] and [[Kat Cammack]] voted for this act.<ref>https://www.yahoo.com/now/heres-47-republicans-voted-marriage-214200413.html</ref>

Despite its name, the Respect for Marriage Act shows no respect for traditional marriage whatsoever by attempting to further give homosexuals [[special rights|special "rights"]] in attempting to make same-sex "marriage" "legal", even though there is no "right" to same-sex "marriage" to be found anywhere in the Constitution, a fact conveniently ignored by liberals who support the Act and the ''Obergefell'' decision.

Despite its name, the Respect for Marriage Act shows no respect for traditional marriage whatsoever by attempting to further give homosexuals [[special rights|special "rights"]] in attempting to make same-sex "marriage" "legal", even though there is no "right" to same-sex "marriage" to be found anywhere in the Constitution, a fact conveniently ignored by liberals who support the Act and the ''Obergefell'' decision.