Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
no edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:  
In the [[United States Constitution]] Article I, Section 6, Clause 1, the '''Speech and Debate Clause''' declares that members of both houses of [[Congress]]:
 
In the [[United States Constitution]] Article I, Section 6, Clause 1, the '''Speech and Debate Clause''' declares that members of both houses of [[Congress]]:
 
{{cquote|shall in all Cases, except [[Treason]], [[Felony]], and Breach of the Peace, be privileged from Arrest during their attendance at the Session of their Respective Houses, and in going to and from the same, and for any Speech or Debate in either House, they shall not be questioned in any other Place.}}
 
{{cquote|shall in all Cases, except [[Treason]], [[Felony]], and Breach of the Peace, be privileged from Arrest during their attendance at the Session of their Respective Houses, and in going to and from the same, and for any Speech or Debate in either House, they shall not be questioned in any other Place.}}
−
   
The purpose of the '''Speech and Debate Clause''' is to protect members from being arrested by the [[President]] or other representatives of the [[Executive branch]] on a ploy to inhibit them from voting a specific way or taking actions with which he/she might hold an opposing view.
 
The purpose of the '''Speech and Debate Clause''' is to protect members from being arrested by the [[President]] or other representatives of the [[Executive branch]] on a ploy to inhibit them from voting a specific way or taking actions with which he/she might hold an opposing view.
    
In court decisions this is more frequently referred to as the Speech '''''or''''' Debate Clause, rather than the Speech and Debate Clause.  Overall, nearly 1,400 court decisions refer to this principle, including 44 decisions by the [[U.S. Supreme Court]].
 
In court decisions this is more frequently referred to as the Speech '''''or''''' Debate Clause, rather than the Speech and Debate Clause.  Overall, nearly 1,400 court decisions refer to this principle, including 44 decisions by the [[U.S. Supreme Court]].
 +
 +
Senator [[Lindsey Graham]] (R-SC) cited this as a defense against a subpoena by a [[Democrat]] prosecutor to compel him to answer questions under oath before an unusual special purpose grand jury in [[Georgia]].
    
== Prominent cases ==
 
== Prominent cases ==
Anthony, Irenaeus, Siteadmin, apieditor, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
126,500

edits

Navigation menu