1,066
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 53:
Line 53: + +
→Another concern: ridiculous at multiple levels
:: The most damning piece of testimony, as seen by contemporaries and later historians, was his statement that: "If it is a question of wisdom and judgment, as demonstrated by actions since 1945, then I would say one would be wiser not to grant clearance."
:: The most damning piece of testimony, as seen by contemporaries and later historians, was his statement that: "If it is a question of wisdom and judgment, as demonstrated by actions since 1945, then I would say one would be wiser not to grant clearance."
: I don't know what would be "damning" about that; JRO had his hearing and the authorities ended up agreeing with Teller. This is another example of WP bias that it uses unnamed sources like this to damn Teller. If there are people who really say that someone could dishonestly maintain commie connections (as JRO did) and still keep a security clearance, then they should be named. [[User:RSchlafly|RSchlafly]] 23:04, 5 March 2007 (EST)
: I don't know what would be "damning" about that; JRO had his hearing and the authorities ended up agreeing with Teller. This is another example of WP bias that it uses unnamed sources like this to damn Teller. If there are people who really say that someone could dishonestly maintain commie connections (as JRO did) and still keep a security clearance, then they should be named. [[User:RSchlafly|RSchlafly]] 23:04, 5 March 2007 (EST)
:: Actually, it was pretty daming because it showed how Teller didn't care much about whether or not Oppenheimer had done anything, all that mattered was his belief that Oppenheimer lacked sufficient "wisdom" (whatever that meant). In any event, "damining" is not NPOV, so I've replaced that. Now, it would very much help matters if instead of attacking problems on Wikipedia you addressed the concerns brought up here. The Wikipedia article could claim that Teller was an alien nazi from a moon of Saturn and it wouldn't alter in the slightest what our article here should have. [[User:JoshuaZ|JoshuaZ]] 23:10, 5 March 2007 (EST)