SkipCaptcha
101
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 1:
Line 1: − + − − Line 22:
Line 20: +
→article problems: Errors.
{{bias}}
{{bias}}
==article problems==
==Article problems==
Second Wave did not "resurge"-the feminism that emerged out of the later 80's/early 90's is Third Wave.
Second Wave did not "resurge"-the feminism that emerged out of the later 80's/early 90's is Third Wave.
Also, feminism, contrary to what many people think, does not revolve around abortion. Feminist work also involves issues such as affordable access to childcare and prevention of domestic violence, just to name a couple. Couldn't this article reflect that rather than lumping all of feminism into one category of ideology?
Also, feminism, contrary to what many people think, does not revolve around abortion. Feminist work also involves issues such as affordable access to childcare and prevention of domestic violence, just to name a couple. Couldn't this article reflect that rather than lumping all of feminism into one category of ideology?
----
----
Removed opinion.--[[User:Elamdri|Elamdri]] 03:10, 12 March 2007 (EDT)
Removed opinion.--[[User:Elamdri|Elamdri]] 03:10, 12 March 2007 (EDT)
::I’m curious why a person who would not accept a philosopher of science as a credible source for an entry on science would accept the definition of a politician/lawyer as definitive in terms of a philosophical/social/academic movement. Let alone why you would think she would be a “leading source for a definition”. Not that I object to the content of her definition, but the strongest claim I think you can support with it is “some politicians endorsed by [[NOW]] believe feminism means…” An interesting, but not especaly useful or informative claim.--[[User:Reginod|Reginod]] 15:48, 30 March 2007 (EDT)
::I’m curious why a person who would not accept a philosopher of science as a credible source for an entry on science would accept the definition of a politician/lawyer as definitive in terms of a philosophical/social/academic movement. Let alone why you would think she would be a “leading source for a definition”. Not that I object to the content of her definition, but the strongest claim I think you can support with it is “some politicians endorsed by [[NOW]] believe feminism means…” An interesting, but not especaly useful or informative claim.--[[User:Reginod|Reginod]] 15:48, 30 March 2007 (EDT)
:::The article is full of errors. For example, many feminists love to cook, love having a family, and do housework – though expect their partner's help. Also women did not have equal educational opportunities for a long while, especially a university education. The article needs to be carefully revised '''by a conservative woman'''.--[[User:RobLeonardWoo|RobLeonardWoo]] ([[User talk:RobLeonardWoo|talk]]) 09:43, September 12, 2022 (EDT)
==Defining feminism==
==Defining feminism==