Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
23 bytes added ,  00:24, September 16, 2022
no edit summary
Line 4: Line 4:     
*''Younger'' abstention ("Federal courts may enjoin pending state administrative proceedings that vindicate important state interests only in extraordinary circumstances."<ref>''Allen v. Louisiana State Bd. of Dentistry'', 835 F.2d 100, 103 (5th Cir. 1988)</ref>)
 
*''Younger'' abstention ("Federal courts may enjoin pending state administrative proceedings that vindicate important state interests only in extraordinary circumstances."<ref>''Allen v. Louisiana State Bd. of Dentistry'', 835 F.2d 100, 103 (5th Cir. 1988)</ref>)
−
*''Pullman'' abstention (when a constitutional issue might be avoided by allowing state courts to interpret an ambiguous state law)
+
*[[Pullman abstention|''Pullman'' abstention]] (when a constitutional issue might be avoided by allowing state courts to interpret an ambiguous state law)
 
*''Colorado River'' abstention doctrine (avoid duplicative proceedings in another state or federal court)
 
*''Colorado River'' abstention doctrine (avoid duplicative proceedings in another state or federal court)
  
Anthony, Irenaeus, Siteadmin, apieditor, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
126,551

edits

Navigation menu