Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 9: Line 9:     
The Platforms’ own representations confirm this. They’ve told their users: “We try to explicitly view ourselves as not editors. ... We don’t want
 
The Platforms’ own representations confirm this. They’ve told their users: “We try to explicitly view ourselves as not editors. ... We don’t want
−
to have editorial judgment over the content that’s in your feed.” They’ve told the public that they “may not monitor,” “do not endorse,” and “cannot take responsibility for” the content on their Platforms. They’ve told Congress that their “goal is to offer a platform for all ideas.” And they’ve told courts—over and over again—that they simply “serv[e] as conduits for other parties’ speech.”
+
to have editorial judgment over the content that’s in your feed.” They’ve told the public that they “may not monitor,” “do not endorse,” and “cannot take responsibility for” the content on their Platforms. They’ve told Congress that their “goal is to offer a platform for all ideas.” And they’ve told courts—over and over again—that they simply “serv[e] as conduits for other parties’ speech.”<ref>Slip op. pp. 28-29 (footnotes omitted).</ref>}}
−
<ref>Slip op. pp. 28-29 (footnotes omitted).</ref>
      
== Judge Jones' Concurrence ==
 
== Judge Jones' Concurrence ==
Anthony, Irenaeus, Siteadmin, apieditor, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
126,471

edits

Navigation menu