Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
917 bytes added ,  22:33, September 23, 2022
no edit summary
Line 45: Line 45:     
United States v. Williams, 949 F.3d 1056 (7th Cir. 2020)
 
United States v. Williams, 949 F.3d 1056 (7th Cir. 2020)
 +
 +
== Section 455(f) ==
 +
 +
28 USC § 455(f) allows divesture of stock without requiring recusal:
 +
{{cquote|Notwithstanding the preceding provisions of this section, if any justice, judge, magistrate [magistrate judge], or bankruptcy judge to whom a matter has been assigned would be disqualified, after substantial judicial time has been devoted to the matter, because of the appearance or discovery, after the matter was assigned to him or her, that he or she individually or as a fiduciary, or his or her spouse or minor child residing in his or her household, has a financial interest in a party (other than an interest that could be substantially affected by the outcome), disqualification is not required if the justice, judge, magistrate [magistrate judge], bankruptcy judge, spouse or minor child, as the case may be, divests himself or herself of the interest that provides the grounds for the disqualification.}}
 
[[category:law]]
 
[[category:law]]
 
[[category:recusal]]
 
[[category:recusal]]
Anthony, Irenaeus, Siteadmin, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
125,876

edits

Navigation menu