Changes

407 bytes added ,  17:35, September 25, 2022
additional examples
Line 8: Line 8:     
In ''Frey'', the [[Michigan]] appellate court expressly relied on the [[FDA]]'s website posting that wrongly disparages ivermectin.<ref>https://www.fda.gov/consumers/consumer-updates/why-you-should-not-use-ivermectin-treat-or-prevent-covid-19</ref>
 
In ''Frey'', the [[Michigan]] appellate court expressly relied on the [[FDA]]'s website posting that wrongly disparages ivermectin.<ref>https://www.fda.gov/consumers/consumer-updates/why-you-should-not-use-ivermectin-treat-or-prevent-covid-19</ref>
 +
 +
Additional examples include:
 +
*''Gahl v. Aurora Health Care, Inc.'', 977 N.W.2d 756, 782 (Wis. Ct. App. 2022) ("Throughout the October 12 hearing, the circuit court repeatedly questioned the parties to elicit additional information and greater detail. For example, the circuit court asked questions regarding the Food and Drug Administration's (FDA) position regarding ivermectin as a COVID-19 treatment."
 +
 
== References ==
 
== References ==
 
{{reflist}}
 
{{reflist}}
 
[[category:coronavirus]]
 
[[category:coronavirus]]
Anthony, Irenaeus, Siteadmin, apieditor, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
126,194

edits