Changes

== Reaction by FIDE ==

== Reaction by FIDE ==

The governing body of chess, FIDE, issued a weak, middle-of-the-road style of statement reminding everyone that the Sinquefield Cup was not an FIDE event, and that FIDE does oppose cheating in chess.<ref>https://www.fide.com/news/1999</ref>  The FIDE failed to support [[Magnus Carlsen]] as much as it should have, as Carlsen takes a strong stance against cheating in chess.

The governing body of chess, FIDE, issued a weak, middle-of-the-road style of statement reminding everyone that the Sinquefield Cup was not an FIDE event, and that FIDE does oppose cheating in chess.<ref>https://www.fide.com/news/1999</ref>  The FIDE failed to support [[Magnus Carlsen]] as much as it should have, as Carlsen takes a strong stance against cheating in chess.

== Reaction by Liberal Media ==

== Reaction by Liberal Media ==

The [[liberal media]] tended to criticize the defender of integrity in [[chess]], [[Magnus Carlsen]].<ref>https://www.dispatch.com/story/sports/columns/2022/09/23/magnus-carlsen-arguably-the-goat-of-the-chess-world-needs-to-back-up-his-recent-moves/69511016007/</ref>

The [[liberal media]] tended to criticize the defender of integrity in [[chess]], [[Magnus Carlsen]].<ref>https://www.dispatch.com/story/sports/columns/2022/09/23/magnus-carlsen-arguably-the-goat-of-the-chess-world-needs-to-back-up-his-recent-moves/69511016007/</ref>