Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search

Cannabis and courts (view source)

Revision as of 05:30, October 3, 2022

487 bytes added ,  05:30, October 3, 2022
Federal district courts have been relying on the dormant Commerce Clause in striking down city and state residency requirements or favoritism.
Line 7: Line 7:     
“This [decision] really portends the emergence of a national market in cannabis,” said Robert Mikos, a Vanderbilt legal scholar and expert on federalism and drug laws. “We will see changes to state import and export bans.”}}
 
“This [decision] really portends the emergence of a national market in cannabis,” said Robert Mikos, a Vanderbilt legal scholar and expert on federalism and drug laws. “We will see changes to state import and export bans.”}}
 +
== District court decisions ==
 +
 +
Federal district courts have been relying on the dormant [[Commerce Clause]] in striking down city and state residency requirements or favoritism.
 +
 +
=== Michigan ===
 +
A federal district court ruled in June 2021 in Michigan against [[Detroit]] for favoring longtime city residents in its licensing scheme.
 +
=== Missouri ===
 +
A federal district court ruled in November 2021 against [[Missouri]]’s residency requirement for owning medical marijuana entities.
 +
 
== References ==
 
== References ==
 
{{reflist}}
 
{{reflist}}
 
[[category:cannabis]]
 
[[category:cannabis]]
 
[[category:Commerce Clause]]
 
[[category:Commerce Clause]]
Aschlafly
Anthony, Irenaeus, Siteadmin, apieditor, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
126,500

edits

Retrieved from "https://www.conservapedia.com/Special:MobileDiff/1890982"

Navigation menu