Changes

::''Disproof'': in 1990, archaeologists discovered a burial cave dating from around 50 A.D., only 20 years after the Crucifixion, which contained a stone ossuary engraved with his formal name "Jehosaph son of Caiapha."<ref>https://dannythedigger.com/caiaphas-ossuary/</ref>

::''Disproof'': in 1990, archaeologists discovered a burial cave dating from around 50 A.D., only 20 years after the Crucifixion, which contained a stone ossuary engraved with his formal name "Jehosaph son of Caiapha."<ref>https://dannythedigger.com/caiaphas-ossuary/</ref>

*that the Hittites—mentioned more than 50 times in the Old Testament, did not exist because no trace of this ancient civilization could be found for many years.  

*that the Hittites—mentioned more than 50 times in the Old Testament, did not exist because no trace of this ancient civilization could be found for many years.  

::''Disproof'': Archeological discoveries in the 19th and 20th centuries proved that the Hittites existed as the Bible describes.<ref>https://www.hopechannel.com/au/read/the-hittites-a-civilisation-lost-and-found#:~:text=A%20friendly%20Turk%20then%20led%20Texier%20across%20a%20valley%20to%20a%20clump%20of%20large%20rocks%20jutting%20from%20the%20ground.%20The%20place%20was%20known%20as%20Yazilikaya.%20Here%2C%20engraved%20on%20the%20side%20of%20one%20of%20the%20rocks%2C%20was%20a%20line%20of%20figures%20with%20peaked%20hats.%20Who%20were%20they%3F%20Texier%20was%20mystified.</ref>

::''Disproof'': Archeological discoveries in the 19th and 20th centuries proved that the Hittites existed as the Bible describes.<ref>https://www.hopechannel.com/au/read/the-hittites-a-civilisation-lost-and-found.</ref>

*that theories of modern physics proved there was no creation, and thus the [[Genesis]] account could not possibly be correct.

*that theories of modern physics proved there was no creation, and thus the [[Genesis]] account could not possibly be correct.

::''Disproof'': the Catholic priest [[Georges-Henri Lemaitre]] proved, against the resistance of anti-[[Bible]] scientists, that modern theories of physics themselves required the occurrence of a singular creation; this was first ridiculed with the term [[Big Bang]] but then later accepted by the [[atheists]].

::''Disproof'': the Catholic priest [[Georges-Henri Lemaitre]] proved, against the resistance of anti-[[Bible]] scientists, that modern theories of physics themselves required the occurrence of a singular creation; this was first ridiculed with the term [[Big Bang]] but then later accepted by the [[atheists]].

::''Disproof'': In 1912, W.M. Ramsey discovered a fragment proving that a new seat of government was established in Syria, which included Palestine, between 10 and 7 B.C., which would have necessitated one or more censuses shortly thereafter.  There is additional evidence of a census in Palestine at this time in the writings of Tertullian.<ref>http://www.historian.net/NTHX.html</ref>

::''Disproof'': In 1912, W.M. Ramsey discovered a fragment proving that a new seat of government was established in Syria, which included Palestine, between 10 and 7 B.C., which would have necessitated one or more censuses shortly thereafter.  There is additional evidence of a census in Palestine at this time in the writings of Tertullian.<ref>http://www.historian.net/NTHX.html</ref>

*that [[genetics]] disproves the 30th chapter of [[Genesis]]

*that [[genetics]] disproves the 30th chapter of [[Genesis]]

::''Disproof'': There is no inconsistency.<ref>[http://www.tektonics.org/lp/oddgenes.html Does Genesis 30:9 teach "magical genetics"?] from [[Tektonics]]</ref>

::''Disproof'': There is no inconsistency.<ref>[https://web.archive.org/web/20160525085455/http://www.tektonics.org/lp/oddgenes.php Does Genesis 30:9 teach "magical genetics"?] from [[Tektonics]]</ref>

*that the Bible incorrectly states the number of feet on an insect

*that the Bible incorrectly states the number of feet on an insect

::''Disproof'': Once the meaning of "leg" is correctly understood, it is seen that the Bible is right.<ref>[http://www.tektonics.org/af/buglegs.html Is the Bible wrong about insects having "four feet"?] from [[Tektonics]]</ref>

::''Disproof'': Once the meaning of "leg" is correctly understood, it is seen that the Bible is right.<ref>[http://www.tektonics.org/af/buglegs.html Is the Bible wrong about insects having "four feet"?] from [[Tektonics]]</ref>