Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
→‎YEC POV Or Not?: Both (all) points of view.
Line 620: Line 620:     
::I want to discuss this topic not only to decide what is the contents of this article but how different views are handled in CP. Is this site for YEC? Does this site say directly it is? Or is this site going to be something else - wider views... --[[User:Aulis Eskola|Aulis Eskola]] 14:14, 4 June 2007 (EDT)
 
::I want to discuss this topic not only to decide what is the contents of this article but how different views are handled in CP. Is this site for YEC? Does this site say directly it is? Or is this site going to be something else - wider views... --[[User:Aulis Eskola|Aulis Eskola]] 14:14, 4 June 2007 (EDT)
 +
:::Conservapedia does not suppress the YEC view, but neither does it endorse the YEC view, nor the evolutionary view.  So statements that are worded as though the evolutionary view is correct will be changed so as to read that it is the evolutionary view rather than fact, but the evolutionary view is still allowed.  Is that clear enough?  [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 21:54, 4 June 2007 (EDT)
    
==Direction of research efforts==
 
==Direction of research efforts==
nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW
13,254

edits

Navigation menu