1,515 bytes added
, 14:39, October 22, 2022
'''Collateral estoppel cases''' in the context of [[patent]]s and otherwise include the following:
*Arctic Cat v. Bombardier Rec. Prods., 876 F.3d 1350 (Fed. Cir. 2017)
*B&B Hardware v. Hargis Indus., 575 U.S. 138 (2015)
*Blonder-Tongue Laboratories v. University of Illinois Foundation, 402 U.S. 313 (1971)
*Bravo-Fernandez v. United States, 580 U.S. 5 (2016)
*Cisco Sys. v. Capella Photonics, 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 230554 (N.D. Cal. Dec. 8, 2020)
*Downey v. State Farm Fire & Cas. Co., 266 F.3d 675 (7th Cir. 2001)
*eBay v. MercExchange, 547 U.S. 388 (2006)
*Epic Systems Corp. v. Lewis, 138 S. Ct. 1612 (2018)
*Grogan v. Garner, 498 U.S. 279 (1991) (collateral estoppel does not apply with the subsequent litigation requires a higher burden of proof)
*In re Yanks, 931 F.2d 42 (11th Cir. 1992)
*Jump Rope Sys. v. Coulter Ventures, 2021 U.S. App. LEXIS 30054 (Fed. Cir. Oct. 6, 2021)
*KSR Int’l v. Teleflex, 550 U.S. 398 (2007)
*Kircher v. Putnam Funds Trust, 547 U.S. 633 (2006)
*Medtronic v. Mirowski Family Ventures, 571 U.S. 191 (2014)
*Microsoft Corp. v. i4i Ltd. P’ship, 564 U.S. 91 (2011)
*Papst Licensing GMBH & Co. KG v. Samsung Electronics America, 924 F.3d 1243 (Fed. Cir. 2019)
*Sanofi-Aventis U.S. LLC v. Mylan GmbH, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 170790 (D.N.J. Oct. 2, 2019)
*Taylor Brands v. GB II Corp., 627 F.3d 874 (Fed. Cir. 2010)
*United States v. Stauffer Chemical, 464 U.S. 165 (1984)
*XY, LLC v. Trans Ova Genetics, L.C., 890 F.3d 1282 (Fed. Cir. 2018)
[[category:Patent Law]]