Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search

Collateral estoppel cases (view source)

Revision as of 15:23, October 22, 2022

54 bytes removed ,  15:23, October 22, 2022
no edit summary
Line 8: Line 8:  
*Downey v. State Farm Fire & Cas. Co., 266 F.3d 675 (7th Cir. 2001)
 
*Downey v. State Farm Fire & Cas. Co., 266 F.3d 675 (7th Cir. 2001)
 
*eBay v. MercExchange, 547 U.S. 388 (2006)  
 
*eBay v. MercExchange, 547 U.S. 388 (2006)  
−
*Epic Systems Corp. v. Lewis, 138 S. Ct. 1612 (2018)
   
*Grogan v. Garner, 498 U.S. 279 (1991) (collateral estoppel does not apply with the subsequent litigation requires a higher burden of proof)
 
*Grogan v. Garner, 498 U.S. 279 (1991) (collateral estoppel does not apply with the subsequent litigation requires a higher burden of proof)
 
*In re Yanks, 931 F.2d 42 (11th Cir. 1992)  
 
*In re Yanks, 931 F.2d 42 (11th Cir. 1992)  
Aschlafly
Anthony, Irenaeus, Siteadmin, apieditor, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
126,208

edits

Retrieved from "https://www.conservapedia.com/Special:MobileDiff/1894387"

Navigation menu