| Line 27: |
Line 27: |
| | *Jackson v. Metro. Edison Co., 419 U.S. 345 (1974) | | *Jackson v. Metro. Edison Co., 419 U.S. 345 (1974) |
| | *Lexmark Int'l v. Static Control Components, 572 U.S. 118 (2014) | | *Lexmark Int'l v. Static Control Components, 572 U.S. 118 (2014) |
| − | *'''Lloyd Corp. v. Tanner''', 407 U.S. 551 (1972) (the First Amendment “safeguard[s] the rights of free speech” by placing “limitations on state action, not on action by” private actors) | + | *''Lloyd Corp. v. Tanner'', 407 U.S. 551 (1972) (the First Amendment “safeguard[s] the rights of free speech” by placing “limitations on state action, not on action by” private actors) |
| | *Lugar v. Edmondson Oil, 457 U.S. 922 (1982) | | *Lugar v. Edmondson Oil, 457 U.S. 922 (1982) |
| | *''[[Lujan v. Defenders of Wildlife]]'', 504 U.S. 555 (1992) | | *''[[Lujan v. Defenders of Wildlife]]'', 504 U.S. 555 (1992) |
| Line 39: |
Line 39: |
| | *Pub. Citizen v. U.S. Dep’t of Just., 491 U.S. 440 (1989) | | *Pub. Citizen v. U.S. Dep’t of Just., 491 U.S. 440 (1989) |
| | *Randall D. Wolcott, M.D., P.A. v. Sebelius, 635 F.3d 757 (5th Cir. 2011) | | *Randall D. Wolcott, M.D., P.A. v. Sebelius, 635 F.3d 757 (5th Cir. 2011) |
| − | *Rendell-Baker v. Kohn, 457 U.S. 830 (1982) | + | *''Rendell-Baker v. Kohn'', 457 U.S. 830 (1982) (a First Amendment exists for private conduct only if that conduct “can fairly be seen as state action”) |
| | *Renne v. Geary, 501 U.S. 312 (1991) | | *Renne v. Geary, 501 U.S. 312 (1991) |
| | *Roberts v. Louisiana Downs, 742 F.2d 221 (5th Cir. 1984) | | *Roberts v. Louisiana Downs, 742 F.2d 221 (5th Cir. 1984) |