Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search

Antitrust cases (view source)

Revision as of 03:52, October 23, 2022

236 bytes added ,  03:52, October 23, 2022
prudential standing
Line 75: Line 75:  
*''Wal-Mart Stores v. Sturges'', 52 S.W.3d 711 (Tex. 2001) ([[Texas]] recognizes tortious interference with existing business relations and tortious interference with prospective business relations)  
 
*''Wal-Mart Stores v. Sturges'', 52 S.W.3d 711 (Tex. 2001) ([[Texas]] recognizes tortious interference with existing business relations and tortious interference with prospective business relations)  
 
*Walker Process Equip. v. Food Mach. & Chem. Corp., 382 U.S. 172 (1965)  
 
*Walker Process Equip. v. Food Mach. & Chem. Corp., 382 U.S. 172 (1965)  
−
*Ward v. Santa Fe Indep. Sch. Dist., 393 F.3d 599 (5th Cir. 2004)  
+
*''Ward v. Santa Fe Indep. Sch. Dist.'', 393 F.3d 599 (5th Cir. 2004) (establishing that “prudential limitations on standing” require that “a litigant ... must assert his or her own legal rights and interests and cannot rest a claim to relief on the legal rights or interest of third parties”)  
 
*Warth v. Seldin, 422 U.S. 490 (1975)  
 
*Warth v. Seldin, 422 U.S. 490 (1975)  
 
*Watts v. Northside Indep. Sch. Dist., 37 F. 4th 1094 (5th Cir. 2022)
 
*Watts v. Northside Indep. Sch. Dist., 37 F. 4th 1094 (5th Cir. 2022)
 
[[category:antitrust]]
 
[[category:antitrust]]
Aschlafly
Anthony, Irenaeus, Siteadmin, apieditor, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
126,194

edits

Retrieved from "https://www.conservapedia.com/Special:MobileDiff/1894552"

Navigation menu