Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
57 bytes added ,  04:06, October 23, 2022
no edit summary
Line 76: Line 76:  
*Walker Process Equip. v. Food Mach. & Chem. Corp., 382 U.S. 172 (1965)  
 
*Walker Process Equip. v. Food Mach. & Chem. Corp., 382 U.S. 172 (1965)  
 
*''Ward v. Santa Fe Indep. Sch. Dist.'', 393 F.3d 599 (5th Cir. 2004) (establishing that “prudential limitations on standing” require that “a litigant ... must assert his or her own legal rights and interests and cannot rest a claim to relief on the legal rights or interest of third parties”)  
 
*''Ward v. Santa Fe Indep. Sch. Dist.'', 393 F.3d 599 (5th Cir. 2004) (establishing that “prudential limitations on standing” require that “a litigant ... must assert his or her own legal rights and interests and cannot rest a claim to relief on the legal rights or interest of third parties”)  
−
*Warth v. Seldin, 422 U.S. 490 (1975)  
+
*''Warth v. Seldin'', 422 U.S. 490 (1975) (standing cannot be based on the interests of others)
 
*Watts v. Northside Indep. Sch. Dist., 37 F. 4th 1094 (5th Cir. 2022)
 
*Watts v. Northside Indep. Sch. Dist., 37 F. 4th 1094 (5th Cir. 2022)
 
[[category:antitrust]]
 
[[category:antitrust]]
 
[[category:First Amendment]]
 
[[category:First Amendment]]
Anthony, Irenaeus, Siteadmin, apieditor, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
126,194

edits

Navigation menu