Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
→‎Frivolous lawsuit by Niemann: An analysis on Bloomberg of similar cases brought in the past indicates that it is unlikely the plaintiff would prevail.
Line 75: Line 75:     
As of October 22, the case had not been assigned to a district court judge, but a magistrate judge has granted motion for the [[New York City]] law firm to pursue the case in the courtroom in [[St. Louis]].
 
As of October 22, the case had not been assigned to a district court judge, but a magistrate judge has granted motion for the [[New York City]] law firm to pursue the case in the courtroom in [[St. Louis]].
 +
 +
An analysis on Bloomberg of similar cases brought in the past indicates that it is unlikely the plaintiff would prevail.<ref>https://www.bloomberg.com/opinion/articles/2022-10-23/hans-niemann-s-100-million-chess-lawsuit-will-be-tough-to-win</ref>
 
===Response by Chess.com===
 
===Response by Chess.com===
 
As posted by defendant Chess.com in response to the lawsuit, on its website:
 
As posted by defendant Chess.com in response to the lawsuit, on its website:
Line 80: Line 82:     
There is no merit to Hans’ allegations, and Chess.com looks forward to setting the record straight on behalf of its team and all honest chess players.<ref>https://www.chess.com/news/view/niemann-files-100-million-defamation-lawsuit</ref>}}
 
There is no merit to Hans’ allegations, and Chess.com looks forward to setting the record straight on behalf of its team and all honest chess players.<ref>https://www.chess.com/news/view/niemann-files-100-million-defamation-lawsuit</ref>}}
 +
 
== See also==
 
== See also==
 
*[[Magnus-Niemann chess match]]
 
*[[Magnus-Niemann chess match]]
Anthony, Irenaeus, Siteadmin, apieditor, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
126,214

edits

Navigation menu