| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| | '''Antitrust cases''', including those under Section 2 of the [[Sherman Act]] and on [[standing]] and [[subject matter jurisdiction]], entail the following 78 cases (15 by the Supreme Court, 27 by the [[Fifth Circuit]], 18 by district or state courts in [[Texas]], and 7 by other Circuits): | | '''Antitrust cases''', including those under Section 2 of the [[Sherman Act]] and on [[standing]] and [[subject matter jurisdiction]], entail the following 78 cases (15 by the Supreme Court, 27 by the [[Fifth Circuit]], 18 by district or state courts in [[Texas]], and 7 by other Circuits): |
| | *''Abraham & Veneklasen Joint Venture v. Am. Quarter Horse Ass’n'', 776 F.3d 321 (5th Cir. 2015) (“[E]ssential attributes of illegal monopoly power are judged by the monopolist’s participation in the relevant market.”) | | *''Abraham & Veneklasen Joint Venture v. Am. Quarter Horse Ass’n'', 776 F.3d 321 (5th Cir. 2015) (“[E]ssential attributes of illegal monopoly power are judged by the monopolist’s participation in the relevant market.”) |
| − | *Adams v. Am. Bar Assoc., 400 F. Supp. 219 (E.D. Pa. 1975) | + | *''Adams v. Am. Bar Assoc.'', 400 F. Supp. 219 (E.D. Pa. 1975) (“The antitrust laws ... do not reach conduct which the plaintiffs perceive as a monopoly of free trade in ideas.”) |
| | *Afzal v. Am. Bd. of Internal Med., 2022 WL 2447115 (3d Cir. July 6, 2022) | | *Afzal v. Am. Bd. of Internal Med., 2022 WL 2447115 (3d Cir. July 6, 2022) |
| | *''Alamo Forensic Servs. v. Bexar Cty.'', 2020 WL 2559956 (W.D. Tex. May 19, 2020) (lack of standing case similar to ''Duran'' decision below) | | *''Alamo Forensic Servs. v. Bexar Cty.'', 2020 WL 2559956 (W.D. Tex. May 19, 2020) (lack of standing case similar to ''Duran'' decision below) |
| Line 36: |
Line 36: |
| | *Jallali v. Nat’l Bd. of Osteopathic Med. Examiners, Inc., 2012 WL 3151553 (S.D. Fla. Aug. 2, 2012) | | *Jallali v. Nat’l Bd. of Osteopathic Med. Examiners, Inc., 2012 WL 3151553 (S.D. Fla. Aug. 2, 2012) |
| | *John Paul Mitchell Sys. v. Randalls Food Mkts., 17 S.W.3d 721 (Tex. App. 2000) | | *John Paul Mitchell Sys. v. Randalls Food Mkts., 17 S.W.3d 721 (Tex. App. 2000) |
| − | *Johnson v. Comm’n on Presidential Debates, 869 F.3d 976 (D.C. Cir. 2017) | + | *''Johnson v. Comm’n on Presidential Debates'', 869 F.3d 976 (D.C. Cir. 2017) (antitrust laws are economic, and do not reach marketplace of ideas) |
| | *Kenney v. Am. Bd. of Internal Med., 847 F. App’x 137 (3d Cir. 2021) | | *Kenney v. Am. Bd. of Internal Med., 847 F. App’x 137 (3d Cir. 2021) |
| | *Kenney v. Am. Bd. of Internal Med., 412 F. Supp. 3d 530 (E.D. Pa. 2019) | | *Kenney v. Am. Bd. of Internal Med., 412 F. Supp. 3d 530 (E.D. Pa. 2019) |